So I’ve always thought of environmental awareness and activism as a relatively recent phenomenon, but as early as 1880, there were local folks that believed there was damage being done by the over and uncontrolled harvesting of our timber….
The following is another article quoted from: LAND USES ON HUMBOLDT BAY TRIBUTARIES (Salmon Creek, Elk River, Freshwater Creek and Jacoby Creek), which was compiled by Susie Van Kirk in February 1998
DHT (4 April 1880) Eureka, Eds Daily Times:
Much has been said about Elk River–about the booms and logs and farms there. And is it any wonder? At the present time Elk River valley is in a worse condition than ever before. When I came to be an owner of some land on Elk River about four years ago the banks of that stream on the back line of my land were about sixteen feet deep, while today they are no more than nine feet deep. What is the cause of this great change if the boom and the logs placed in the river are not? Any man who thinks he can make me believe that these booms and logs have not been the cause, I will say in a very few words, he is a fool.
…Why is it that certain men have been given a priviledge to boom Elk River?…
If these men can boom Elk River and not become responsible for the damage they may occasion by so doing, it may be very fine for them, but I can assure you it is not fine for others…
By the first freshet [another word for flood] in December, 1879, most of my improvements on my land were washed out. There were five inches of water in my house, my stable and horses were afloat, and I lost some seven tons of carrots and two thousand feet of lumber–and don’t forget that the booms and logs in the river were the cause of it. Then I made up my mind to sell out to these gentlemen for something—and the answer I received to my offer from D.R. Jones was that he had done no damage; and H.H. Buhne tells me that I had no business to buy the place…B. Glatt